11 / 12
Инженерная элита в постнеклассическую эпоху: смена парадигмы деятельности
11
Engineering elite in Postnonclassical Era:
Activity paradigm shift
©
N.G. Bagdasaryan, S.S. Koloskov
Bauman Moscow State Technical University, Moscow, 105005, Russia
Rationality of engineering elite in postnonclassical era is being transformed. It is re-
quired that a modern engineer has interdisciplinary, comprehensive knowledge, social
design competence and problem-oriented engineering research skills, constructivism and
pragmatism. The area of engineering activity is expanding, knowledge is being diversi-
fied, the term "engineer" is getting fuzzy.
Keywords:
engineering elite, engineering rationality, postnonclassical era, interdiscipli-
nary knowledge.
REFERENCES
[1]
Atlas novykh professiy
[The Atlas of new professions]. Moscow, Skolkovo
Moscow School of Management Publ., 2013, 168 p.
[2]
Gukovskiy M.A.
Mekhanika Leonardo da Vinchi
[The mechanics of Leonardo
da Vinci]. Moscow, USSR Academy of Sciences Publ., 1947, p. 815.
[3]
Lektorskiy V.A.
Vestnik Rossiyskogo filisofskogo obshchestva — Bulletin of the
Russian Philosophical Society
, 2013, no. 3, pp. 19–24.
[4]
Stepin V.S.
Scientific Rationality in Technogenic Culture: Types and Historical
Evolution.
Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference “Rationality
and its Limits” during the International Institute of Philosophy Meeting in
Moscow (September 15–18, 2011).
A. Guseynov, V. Lektorskiy, eds. Moscow,
IFRAN Publ., 2012.
[5]
Shukhova E.M.
Nashe nasledie — Our Heritage
, 2004, no. 70, pp. 113–119.
[6]
Auyang Sunny Y.
Knowledge in Science and Engineering
. Synthese, 2009,
vol. 168, no. 3, pp. 319–331.
[7]
Gorokhov V.G. Ot prostogo k slozhnomu: ot klassicheskogo estestvoznaniya k
tekhnicheskim naukam [From simple to complex, from classical science to the
engineering sciences].
Filosofiya nauki
[Philosophy of Science]. Institute of
Philosophy, RAS, 2013, issue 18, pp.10–29.
[8]
Bagdasaryan N.G., Gavrilina E.A. Pervyy inzhener v rossiyskoy istorii
[The first
engineer in the Russian history].
Proceedings of the Congress The genius of
Shukhov and the modern era April 17–18
. Moscow, Bauman Moscow State
Technical University, 2015, pp. 6–15.
[9]
Olsen J., Christiansen F. Technology and science epistemology, rationality and
the empirical turn.
Synthese
, 2009, vol. 168, no. 3, pp. 313–318.
[10]
Bagdasaryan N.G., Gavrilina E.A.
Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii — Higher
education in Russia,
2010, no. 6, pp. 23–28.
[11]
Prayd V., Medvedev D.A.
Filisofskie nauki — Philosophical sciences,
2008,
no. 1, pp. 97–116.
[12]
Rozov M.A.
Filisofskie nauki — Philosophical sciences,
2008, no. 3, pp. 21–34.
[13]
Stepin V.S.
Klassika, neklassika,postneklassika: kriterii razlicheniya.
[Classics,
no classics, post no classics: criteria for distinguishing].
Postneklassika:
filosofiya, nauka, kultura
[Post No Classics: Philosophy, Science, Culture].
Collective monograph. Mir Publ., 2010, pp. 249–295.