Previous Page  9 / 10 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 9 / 10 Next Page
Page Background

К вопросу о формировании остаточных знаний…

9

On the formation of residual knowledge and pedagogical

assessment tools for its control in a technical university

© A.R. Kritskaya, Yu.S. Belov

Bauman Moscow State Technical University, Kaluga Branch,

Kaluga, 248600, Russia

The paper considers some of the problems that accompany the process of residual

knowledge formation and their control in a technical university. These are the problems

of residual knowledge content selection, methodological support of its formation process,

as well as differentiation and reliability of test materials. The solution of the stated prob-

lems is possible if the residual knowledge of the content of the interdisciplinary connec-

tions between disciplines (professional modules) of the same or different cycles is consid-

ered. This, in turn, will highlight the two components in the structure of residual

knowledge — the basic component and professionally oriented one. The latter regards

any specific curriculum of the particular specialty (field of study). Organizational and

methodological support of the process of formation and control of residual knowledge on

the part of the university is important: well-grounded choice of teaching technologies and

methods, frequency and format of the control procedures, specific pedagogical tech-

niques aimed at maintaining the stability of the formed residual knowledge.

Keywords:

residual knowledge, interdisciplinary communication, binary residual

knowledge, test materials, the stability of residual knowledge.

REFERENCES

[1]

Obrazovatlnyy standart vysshego professionalnogo obrazovaniya Moskovskogo

gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta imeni N.E. Baumana po naprav-

leniyu podgotovki 150700 Mashinostroenie

. [BMSTU Educational Standard of

Higher Professional Education. The Program 150700 “Mechanical Engineer-

ing”]. Available at:

http://hoster.bmstu.ru/~mo/program_own_list_2013.html

(accessed October 12, 2014).

[2]

Natsionalnaya pedagogicheskaya entsiklopedia

[National Pedagogical Encyclo-

pedia]. Available at:

http://didacts.ru

(accessed October 12, 2014).

[3]

Learning Outcomes

. Available at:

http://web.worldbank.org

(accessed October

12, 2014).

[4]

Berdennikova N.G., Medentsev V.I.

Organizatsionno-metodicheskoe obespech-

enie uchebnogo protsessa v vuze. Uchebno-metodicheskoe posobie

[Organiza-

tional-methodical maintenance of educational process in high school. Training

handbook]. St. Petersburg, BATiP Publ., 2006, p. 82. Available at:

http://rudocs.exdat.com/docs/index-411916.html

(accessed October 10, 2014).

[5]

Kolomiytsev Yu.N.

Pedagogicheskie testy kak instrument izmereniya otsenki

znaniy studentov i kachestva obucheniya

[Pedagogical tests as a measurement

tool assessing students’ knowledge and the quality of education]. Proceedings of

Sworld.

2012.

vol.

12,

no.

1,

pp.

3–5.

Available

at:

http://science.samgtu.ru/sites/science.samgtu.ru/files/No.1(

17)%202012.doc (ac-

cessed November 16, 2014).

[6]

Voronov M.V., Sliva A.V., Fokina V.N.

Pravo i obrazovanie — Law and Educa-

tion

, 2005, no. 2, pp. 121–127. Available at:

http://elibrary.ru/

item.asp?id=9228493

(accessed October 10, 2014).