|

Socio-cultural aspects of the evolution of telephone communication from traditional forms to mobile: the experience of sociological analysis

Authors: Los E.V. Published: 01.09.2021
Published in issue: #4(90)/2021  
DOI: 10.18698/2306-8477-2021-4-732  
Category: The Humanities in Technical University | Chapter: Social sciences  
Keywords: wired (traditional) telephony, mobile communications, information and communication technologies, in-depth interview, sociocultural transformations

The article analyzes the relationship between evolution of telephone communication methods and sociocultural transformations of the Russian society. Based on the data of the in-depth interview conducted within the framework of a student research project, conclusions were drawn about the socially determined motives and needs of using a wired and mobile phone by residents of Russia, about the gradual replacement of the historically first type of telephone communication with a more progressive second one, as well as about specifically new functions of information and communication technologies and their role in the formation of modern society and the future of the Russian reality.


References
[1] Kurzweil R. The Singularity is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology. USA, Viking Penguin, 2005, 434 p.
[2] Evolyutsiya telefona: ot Aleksandra Bella do nashikh dney [The Telephone Evolution: from Alexander Bell to the Present Day]. TASS. Available at: https://tass.ru/spec/phone (accessed January 27, 2021).
[3] Ilyushin M.V., Korolev A.V. Nauka. Obshchestvo. Oborona — Science. Society. Defense, 2019, no. 3 (20). Available at: https://www.noo-journal.ru/nauka-obshestvo-oborona/2019-3-20/article-0200-1/ (accessed January 27, 2021).
[4] ITU ICT Infrastructure and Market Structure. Fixed-telephone Subscriptions per 100 Inhabitants (Russian Federation). Available at: https://www.itu.int/net4/ITU-D/icteye/#/compare (accessed January 27, 2021).
[5] Fix the client. Kommersant. Available at: https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/4101781 (accessed January 27, 2021).
[6] Zvonok iz proshlogo: zachem nuzhen gorodskoy telefon? [A Call from the Past: Why do You Need a Fixed Telephone?]. Hi-Tech.Mail.Ru, 14.10.2015. Available at: https://hi-tech.mail.ru/news/fixed-phone/ (accessed January 30, 2021).
[7] Sobiray Е.Е. Zhurnal issledovaniy sotsial’noy politiki — The Journal of Social Policy Study, 2011, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 554–562.
[8] V Rossii za polgoda vyroslo chislo sotovykh abonentov [In Russia, the number of cellular subscribers has grown in six months]. Vedomosti. Available at: https://www.vedomosti.ru/technology/articles/2019/09/11/811031-viroslo-chislo- abonentov (accessed January 30, 2021).
[9] K 2020 godu kolichestvo rossiyan so smartfonami dostignet 95,3 mln [By 2020 the number of Russians with smartphones will reach 95.3 million]. Gazeta.ru Available at: https://www.gazeta.ru/tech/news/2019/12/23/n_13848662.shtml (accessed January 30, 2021).
[10] Dobrinskaya D.E., Martynenko T.S. Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Sotsiologiya — RUDN Journal of Sociology, 2019, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 108–120.
[11] Bauman Z. The Individualized Society. Cambridge, Ma, Polity Publ., 2001 [In Russ.: Bauman Z. Individualizirovannoe obshchestvo. Moscow, Logos Publ., 2005, 390 p.].
[12] Abramov R.N. Sotsiokulturnye aspekty vozdeystviya mobilnoy telefonii na povsednevnost: teoreticheskie perspektivy i prakticheskie rezultaty [Socio-cultural aspects of the impact of mobile telephony on everyday life: theoretical perspectives and practical results]. In: Sovremennost/POST [Modernity / POST]. Moscow, TEIS Publ., 2008, no. 2, pp. 152–167.
[13] Gladarev B.S. Chelovek. Soobshchestvo. Upravleniye (Human. Community. Management), 2007, no. 3, pp. 45–69.
[14] Castells M. Communication Power. Oxford, Oxford University Press Publ., 2009 [In Russ.: Castells M. Vlast Kommunikatsii. Moscow, VShE Publ., 2016, 564 p.].
[15] Bakhtin M.M. Avtor i geroy: K filosofskim osnovam gumanitarnykh nauk [Author and Hero: To the Philosophical Foundations of the Humanities]. St. Petersburg, Azbuka Publ., 2000, 336 p.