|

Socio-economic differentiation of the society in the digital age: is netocracy fiction or reality?

Authors: Rodionova V.G. Published: 09.07.2014
Published in issue: #4(18)/2014  
DOI: 10.18698/2306-8477-2014-4-199  
Category: The Humanities in Technical University | Chapter: Social sciences  
Keywords: socio-economic differentiation of the population, the social state, social policy, real wealth, prosperity, normal level of prosperity, poverty, misery, law of unforeseen consequences, netocracy signs, post-industrial society, technological base of netocracy, cost of competitiveness

The article examines general aspects of socio-economic differentiation of the population in terms of wealth and indicators of real wealth. Scientifically developed methods and criteria for evaluation of social processes are applied in public policy in almost all countries of the world. However, modern science has not sufficiently investigated the latest social phenomena that are brought by digital era in the sphere of social life. Thus, netocracy appears to be a new and understudied phenomenon. It is named as a particular social group, using IT and digital programming methods as the main factors of postindustrial society, the seizure of power and real wealth on a global scale.


References
[1] Bard A., Zoderkvist Ja. Netocracy. The new ruling elite and life after capitalism. Lane. Swedish. MG, 2003. Electronic edition. Available at: http://www.book.ariom.ru/txt672.html
[2] Moore T. Zolotaya kniga, stol’ zhe poleznaya, kak zabavnaya o nailuchshem ustroistve gosudarstva i o novom ostrove Utopii [Golden Book, as useful as fun on the best structure of the state and the new island of Utopia]. Louvain, 1516. Eng. Moscow, 1953 (in Russia).
[3] Campanella T. Gorod Solntsa [Sun City]. 1602, ed. 1623. Moscow, 1954 (in Russian).
[4] Plekhanov G.V. Utopicheskiy sotsializm Х1Х v. [Utopian socialism of the Х1Х century]. Moscow, 1958.
[5] Lobacheva E.N., ed. Ekonomicheskaya teoriya [ Economic theory]. Textbook for universities. Moscow, Yurait Publ., 2010.
[6] Ekonomicheskaya entsiklopediya [Economic encyclopedia]. Moscow, Soviet Encyclopedia Publ., 1975, vol. 2, p. 407.
[7] Konstitutsiya Rossiyskoi federatsii [The Constitution of the Russian Federation]. Moscow, Prospect Publ., 1999, p. 5.
[8] Dolan E.J., Lindsay E.D. Market: microeconomic model. St. Petersburg, Avtokomp Publ., 1992 (in Russian).
[9] Lepsky V.E., ed. Materialy Mezhdunarodnogo foruma "Proekty budushchego: mezhdistsiplinarnyi podkhod" 16-19 oktyabrya 2006, g. Zvenigorod [Proc. Int. Forum "Future projects: an interdisciplinary approach" 16-19 October 2006, Zvenigorod]. Moscow, Cognitive-Center Publ., 2006.
[10] Denisov A.A. Netokratiya kak strategicheskiy sub"ekt 21 veka [Netocracy as a strategic entity of the 21st century ]. Problema sub"ektov rossiyskogo razvitiya [The problem of subjects of the Russian development], pp. 48-57. Available at: http://www.improvement.ru
[11] Yuzbekova I. Kaspersky: polzovateli razocharovalis’ v bezopasnosti Interneta [Kaspersky: Users are out of conceit with Internet security]. RBK daily, 2013, no. 230 (1763), pp. 1, 8. Available at: http://www.rbcdaily.ru
[12] Hipponen M. (F-Secure). The largest source of hacker attacks is the former Soviet Union. RBK daily, 2013, no. 204 (1737), pp. 9. Available at: http://www.rbcdaily.ru
[13] Netokratiya i postmodern [Netocracy and postmodern]. Available at: http://www.netocracy.us/publ
[14] Samuelson P., Nordhaus V. Ekonomika [ Economy]. Moscow, St. Petersburg, Kiev, 2008, pp. 720-726 (in Russian).
[15] Netokratiya kak strateguicheskiy ob"ekt XXI veka [Netocracy as a strategic object of the XXI century]. Available at: http://www.improvement.ru