|

Differences between the Kyiv-Mohyla Collegium and the Jesuit collegiums

Authors: Krylov A.O. Published: 05.05.2023
Published in issue: #2(100)/2023  
DOI: 10.18698/2306-8477-2023-2-839  
Category: The Humanities in Technical University | Chapter: Philosophy Science  
Keywords: Kyiv-Mohyla Collegium, Petro Mohyla, Society of Jesus, second scholasticism, history of education

The paper demonstrates differences between the Kyiv-Mohyla Collegium and the Jesuit collegiums. It compares objectives of creation, composition of the tutors, programs and pedagogical features of those educational institutions. Jesuit academies were created to spread the idea of the Society of Jesus throughout the world, while St. Peter Mohyla set himself tasks that were more modest: teaching Orthodox youths of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth and preparing new generation of the higher clergy for the Kyiv Metropolis. The Kyiv-Mohyla Collegium was closely connected to the church hierarchy, while the Jesuit collegiums were not depending on the episcopates. The Jesuit collegium tutors were coming from different countries and social groups, but they had common pedagogical and scientific background. Tutors of the Kyiv-Mohyla Collegium came from the West Russian gentry, but had different training. The Kyiv-Mohyla Collegium program differed from the Jesuit collegium programs both in the elementary grades and in the philosophy and theology courses. It is concluded that the Kyiv-Mohyla Collegium was not a copy of the Jesuit collegium adapted for the Orthodox environment.


References
[1] Brüning A. On Jesuit Schools, Scholasticism and the Kievan Academy — Some Remarks on the Historical and Ideological Background of its Founding. Київська Академія, 2007, no. 4, pp. 5–19.
[2] Goujon P.S.J. Elites and the Constitution of Jesuit Identity. The Oxford Handbook of the Jesuits. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2019, 1110 p.
[3] Andreev A.Yu. Rossiyskie universitety XVIII — pervoy poloviny XIX veka v kontekste universitetskoy istorii Evropy [Russian Universities of the 18th — the first half of the 19th century in the context of the university history of Europe]. Moscow, Znak Publ., 2009, 640 p.
[4] Turilov A.A., Florya B.N. K voprosu ob istoricheskoy alternative Brestskoy unii [On the question of the historical alternative to the Union of Brest]. In: Brestskaya uniya 1596 g. i obschestvenno-politicheskaya borba na Ukraine i v Belorusii v kontse XVI — nachale XVII vv. Ch. 1. Brestskaya Uniya 1956 g. Istoricheskie prichiny [The Union of Brest of 1596 and the socio-political struggle in Ukraine and Belarus in the late 16th — early 17th centuries. Part 1. Union of Brest of 1596. Historical reasons]. Moscow, Indrik Publ., 1997, pp. 13–58.
[5] Kharlampovich K.V. Zapadnorusskie pravoslavnye shkoly XVI i nachala XVII veka, otnoshenie ikh k inoslavnym, religioznoe obuchenie v nikh i zaslugi ikh v dele zaschity pravoslavnoy very i tserkvi [Western Russian Orthodox schools of the 16th and early 17th centuries, their attitude towards the non-Orthodox, religious education in them and their merits in the defense of the Orthodox faith and the Church]. Kazan, Typolitografiya Imperatorskogo Universiteta, 1898, 524 p.
[6] Khizhnyak Z.I. Pochaskiy Stefan [Pochasky Stefan]. In: Kievo-Mogilyanskaya akademiya v imenakh. XVII–XVIII vv. [Kyiv-Mohyla academy in names. XVII–XVIII centuries]. Kyiv, KM Akademiya Publ., 2001, p. 442.
[7] Petrov I.I. Kievskaya akademiya vo vtoroy polovine XVII v. [Kyiv academy in the second half of the 17th century]. Kyiv, Tipografiya G.T. Korchak-Novitskogo, 1895, 171 p.
[8] Gorobets V.M., Stratiy Ya.M. Innokentiy Gizel [Innokenty Gizel]. In: Kievo-Mogilyanskaya akademiya v imenakh. XVII–XVIII vv. [Kyiv-Mohyla academy in names. XVII–XVIII centuries]. Kyiv, KM Akademiya Publ., 2001, p. 168.
[9] Korzo M.A., Florya B.N. Innokenty (Gizel). In: Pravoslavnaya entsiklopediya [Orthodox Encyclopedia]. Moscow, Pravoslavnaya Entsiklopediya Publ., 2009, vol. XXII, pp. 744–749.
[10] Nimchuk V.V. Smotrytskiy [Smotrytsky]. In: Kievo-Mogilyanskaya akademiya v imenakh. XVII-XVIII vv. [Kyiv-Mohyla academy in names. XVII–XVIII centuries]. Kyiv, KM Akademiya Publ., 2001, p. 499.
[11] Korzo M.A. Pedagogicheskaya sistema iezuitov [The pedagogical system of the Jesuits]. In: Istoriya obrazovaniya i pedagogicheskiy mysli v epokhu Drevnosti, Srednevekovyia i Vozrozhdeniya [The history of education and pedagogical thought in the era of Antiquity, Middle Ages and Renaissance]. Moscow, RUDN Publ., 2004, pp. 469–532.
[12] Zaitsev D.A. Kievo-Mogilyanskaya shkola v ee vliyanii na russkuyu religiozno-filosofskuyu mysl vtoroy poloviny XVII v.: dis. … Cand. Sc. (philos.) [Kiev-Mohyla school in its influence on the Russian religious and philosophical thought in the second half of the 17th century. Diss. … Cand. Sc. (Philosophy)]. Moscow, 2010, 178 p.
[13] Sukhova N.Yu. Dukhovnye shkoly i dukhovnoe prosveschenie v Rossii (XVII — nachalo XX vv. [Spiritual schools and spiritual education in Russia (XVII — early XX centuries)]. Moscow, Saint Petersburg, Aksion Estin Publ., 2013, 78 p.
[14] Ševchenko I. Ukraine between East and West: Essays on Cultural History to the Early Eighteenth Century. Toronto, 1996, pp. 164–186.
[15] Simchich M. Filosofiya ratsionalis v Kievo-Mogilyanskoy akademii. Komparativnyi analiz mogilyanskikh kursov logiki kontsa XVII — pervoy poloviny XVIII vv. [Philosophia rationalis at the Kyiv-Mohyla Academy. Comparative analysis of the Mohylyan courses of logic at the end of the 17th — the first half of the 18th century]. Vinnitsa, O. Vlasyuk Publ., 2009, 239 p.
[16] Leinsle U.G. Sources, Methods, and Forms of Early Modern Theology. The Oxford Handbook of Early Modern Theology, 1600–1800. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2016, pp. 25–43.
[17] Shmurlo E.F. Rimskaya kuriya na russkom pravoslavnom vostoke v 1609-1654 gg. [The Roman Curia in the Russian Orthodox East in 1609–1654]. Prague, Orbis Publ., 1928, pp. 255, 354.
[18] Rolland P.A. Simeon Polotsky na granitse dvukh mirov [Simeon of Polotsk on the border of two worlds]. In: Sravnitelnaya istoriya: metody, zadachi, perspektivy [Comparative history: methods, tasks, perspectives]. Moscow, Institute of World History of the Russian Academy of Sciences Publ., 2003, pp. 154–169.
[19] Sobranie nauki kratkiya ob artikulakh very [A brief collection of science on articles of faith]. Kyiv, Tipografiya Kievo-Pecherskogo Monastyrya, 1645, 106 sheets.
[20] Sukhova N.Yu. Vertograd nauk dukhovnyi [Garden of spiritual sciences]. Moscow, St. Tikhon’s Orthodox University Publ., 2007, 382 p.