Scientific fields as the reflexive forms: transcendental tradition evolution in the E. Husserl’s creative work

Philosophical research is always associated with redefining the subject under study and, accordingly, to reformatting the categorical tools being used. Idea of the scientific field as a heuristic tool is introduced in substantive consideration of the issue. The article reveals originality of the reflexive position occupied by one or another thinker, identifies specific ontological tasks set by the researcher and demonstrates features of the categorical means describing objective reality under study. As a specific historical case, philosophical heritage of Edmund Husserl is attracted dated to the time of his Cartesian Meditations creation. Phenomenological program in the form presented by Husserl is no longer just a critique of rational cognition and scientific research. Above all, it appears to be the critique of consciousness as such in all possible formats of its practical manifestation, including scientific and prescientific, theoretical and practical spiritual, predicative and prepredicative.

References
[1] Husserl E. Erste Philosophie (1923/1924). Zweiter Teil: Theorie der phänomenologischen Reduktion. The Hague, Martinus Nijhoff, 1959, 592 S.
[2] Funke G. Phänomenology and History. Phänomenology and Social Science, Vol. II, Evanston, Northwestern University, 1973, pp. 40–59.
[3] Kakabadze Z.M. Problema “ekzistentsialnogo krizisa” i transtsedentalnaya fenomenologiya E. Gusserlya [The “existential crisis" problem and the E. Husserl’s transcendental phenomenology]. Tbilisi, Metsniereba Publ., 1966, 159 p.
[4] Kuzmina T.A. Nekotorye problemy ontologii i metafiziki v fenomenologii E. Gus-serlya [Certain ontology and metaphysics problems in the E. Husserl’s phenomenology]. In: Ob osobennostyakh razvitiya sovrmennoy burzhuaznoy filosofii [On peculiarities in the modern bourgeois philosophy development]. Moscow, USSR Academy of Sciences, Institute of Philosophy, 1979, pp. 88–101.
[5] Molchanov V.I. Ponyatie transtsedentlnoy subyektivnosti v fenomenologii E. Gusserlya [The concept of transcendental subjectivity in the E. Husserl’s phenomenology]. In: Problemy soznaniya v sovremennoy burzhuaznoy filosofii [Problems of consciousness in modern bourgeois philosophy]. A. Degutis, B. Kuzmitskas, A. Sverdiolas, ed. Vilnius, Academy of Sciences of the Lithuanian SSR, 1983, pp. 51–67.
[6] Divisenko K.S. Kontseptsiya zhiznennogo mira v transtsendentalnoy fenomenologii E. Gusserlya: gorizonty sotsiologicheskogo issledovaniya [The lifeworld concept in the E. Husserl’s transcendental phenomenology: horizons of the sociological research]. Peterburgskaya sotsiologiya segodnya — Petersburg sociology today, 2010, vol. 1, pp. 179–194.
[7] Pugliese A. Zhiznenny mir kak praktichesky gorizont [Lifeworld as a practical horizon]. Fenomenologicheskiye issledovaniya — Phenomenological studies, 2017, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 46–65.
[8] Kovrigina V.Yu. Problema “zhiznennogo mira” v perspective interdistsiplinarnogo diskursa (E. Gusserl i A. Shyutz) [The lifeworld problem in the interdisciplinary discourse perspective (E. Husserl and A. Schütz)]. Vestnik Tverskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser.: Filosofiya — Herald of the Tver State University. Series: Philosophy, 2010, no. 1, pp. 91–97.
[9] Kuzmin A.A. Radikalism idei apriornoy nauki o zhiznennom mire E. Gusserlya i sovremennost [Radicalism of the idea of a priori science about the lifeworld by E. Husserl and contemporaneity]. Lichnost. Kultura. Obshhestvo — Personality. Culture. Society, 2017, vol. 19, no. 3–4, pp. 80–86.
[10] Molchanov V.I. Estestvennaya ustanovka i zhiznenny mir: terminy i problemy [Natural attitude and lifeworld: terms and problems]. Problema sootnosheniya estestvennogo i sotsialnogo v obshchestve i cheloveke — The problem of natural and social ratio in society and individual, 2021, no. 12, pp. 52–64.
[11] Husserl E. Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phänomenologie. Eine Einleitung in die phänomenologische Philosophie. Edited by Walter Biemel. The Hague, Martinus Nijhoff, 1976, 560 S.
[12] Shestakov A.A. “Telos” evropeyskoy mysli: transtsedentalnaya traditsiya kak filosofsky opyt spaseniya cheloveka [Telos of European thought: transcendental tradition as philosophical experience of human salvation]. Vestnik Samarskogo universiteta. Gumanitarny vypusk — Herald of the Samara University. Humanitarian Issue, 1999, no. 3, pp. 5–12.
[13] Filatov V.P. Nauchnoye poznanie i mir cheloveka [Scientific knowledge and the world of people]. Moscow, Politizdat Publ., 1989, 270 p.
[14] Zabluzhdayuschiysya razum? Mnogoobrazie vnenauchnogo znaniya [Deluded mind? Diversity of non-scientific knowledge]. Moscow, Politizdat Publ., 1990, 462 p.
[15] Batyuk K.Ya. Edmund Gusserl o soznanii kak osoboy realnosti [Edmund Husserl on consciousness as special reality]. Vestnik Vyatskogo gosudarstvennogo gumanitarnogo universiteta — Herald of the Vyatka State Humanitarian University, 2011, no. 3–1, p. 23.
[16] Husserl E. Cartesianische Meditationen und Pariser Vorträge. Edited by Stragger. The Hague, Martinus Nijhoff, 1973, 244 S.
[17] Lektorsky V.A., ed. Gnoseologiya v sisteme filosofskogo mirovozzreniya [Gnoseology in the system of philosophical worldview]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1983, 383 p.
[18] Mamardashvili M.K. Klassichesky i neklassichesky idealy ratsionalnosti [Classical and non-classical ideals of rationality]. Tbilisi, Metsniereba Publ., 1984, 82 p.
[19] Gadamer H.-G. Istina i metod. Osnovy filosofskoy germenevtiki [Truth and method. Fundamentals of philosophical hermeneutics]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1988, 700 p.
[20] Husserl E. Phänomenologische Psychologie. Vorlesungen Sommersemester 1925. Edited by Walter Biemel. The Hague, Martinus Nijhoff, 1968, 650 S.
[21] Husserl E. Kartezianskiye razmyshleniya [Cartesian reflections]. Saint-Petersburg, Nauka Publ., 1998, 315 p.
[22] Kant I. Kritika chistogo razuma [Critique of pure reason]. Sochineniya [Works]. In 6 vol., vol. 3. Moscow, Mysl Publ., 1964, 799 p.
[23] Shestakov A.A. Ontologiya poznaniya: prolegomeny k subyektivno-gumanisticheskoy interpretatsii kognitivnogo protsessa [Ontology of cognition: prolegomena to subjective-humanistic interpretation of the cognitive process]. Samara, SSACU Publ., 2004, 160 p.
[24] Molchanov V.I. Vremya i soznaniye: kritika fenomenologicheskoy filosofii [Time and consciousness: criticism of the phenomenological philosophy]. Moscow, Vysshaya Shkola Publ., 1988, 144 p.
[25] Mikeshina L.A. Filosofiya poznaniya. Polemicheskiye glavy [Cognition philosophy. Polemical chapters]. Moscow, Progress–Tradition Publ., 2002, 624 p.
[26] Husserl E. Formale und Transzendentale Logik: Versuch einer Kritik der logischen Vernunft. Halle, Max Niemeyer, 1929, 298 S.
[27] Lektorsky V.A. Teoriya poznaniya kak fenomen kultury. Nauka i poznaniye [Theory of cognition as a culture phenomenon. Science and cognition]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1983, pp. 118–123.
[28] Vēgners U. Husserl and dimensions of temporality: a framework for the analysis of temporal experience. Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology, 2021, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 186–211.
[29] Sanzhenakov A.A. Wittgenstein and Gusserl kak reformatory sotsialnoy nauki [Wittgenstein and Husserl as reformers of social science]. Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki — Epistemology and Philosophy of Science, 2020, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 40–43.