|

Classical, nonclassical and postnonclassical methodologies of science

Authors: Lebedev S.A. Published: 26.02.2019
Published in issue: #2(76)/2019  
DOI: 10.18698/2306-8477-2019-2-596  
Category: The Humanities in Technical University | Chapter: Philosophy Science  
Keywords: science methodology, scientific method, structure of scientific knowledge, scientific pluralism, scientific true, criteria of scientific truth

The purpose of the paper was to study the issue of reconstructing the conceptual core of three different periods in the development of science methodology: classical, nonclassical and postnonclassical. The paper describes the scientific and philosophical underpinnings of these types of science methodology, their relationship with the change of the periods


References
[1] Lebedev S.A. Filosofiya nauchnogo poznaniya. Osnovnye kontseptsii [Philosophy of scientific knowledge. Basic concepts]. Moscow, MPSU Publ., 2014, 272 p.
[2] Lebedev S.A. Nauchny metod: istoriya i teoriya [The scientific method: history and theory]. Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 2018, 448 p.
[3] Lebedev S.A. Novoe v psihologo-pedagogicheskikh issledovaniyah — Innovation in Psychological and Pedagogical Research, 2013, no. 3, pp. 7–18.
[4] Lebedev S.A. Kurs lektsiy po filosofii nauki [Course of lectures on the philosophy of science]. Moscow, BMSTU Publ., 2014, 318 p.
[5] Stepin V.S. Istoriya i filosofiya nauki [History and philosophy of science]. Moscow, Akademicheskiy proekt Publ., 2009, 423 p.
[6] Lebedev S.A. Filosofskie nauki — Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences, 2013, no. 4, pp. 69–83.
[7] Lebedev S.A. Osnovy filosofii nauki [Fundamentals of philosophy of science]. Moscow, Akademicheskiy proekt Publ., 2005.
[8] Lebedev S.A. Voprosy filosofii — Russian Studies in Philosophy, 2015, no. 6, pp. 53–64.
[9] Rickert H. Kulturwissenschaft und Naturwissenschaft. Freiburg, Leipzig und Tübingen, 1899, 76 p. [In Russ.: Rickert H. Nauki o prirode i nauki o kulture. Moscow, Respublika Publ., 1988, 413 p.].
[10] Lebedev S.A. Gumanitarny vestnik — Humanities Bulletin of BMSTU, 2018, no. 4. DOI: 10.18698/2306-8477-2018-4-514
[11] Popper K.R. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London, 1959, 302 p. [In Russ.: Popper K.R. Logika i rost nauchnogo znaniya. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1983].
[12] Lebedev S.A. Izvestiya RAO — Izvestia of the Russian Academy of Education, 2018, no. 2, pp. 5–17.
[13] Lebedev S.A. Voprosy filosofii — Russian Studies in Philosophy, 2017, no. 5, pp. 66–79.
[14] Lebedev S.A. Istoriya i filosofiya nauki [History and philosophy of science]. Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 2018, 688 p.
[15] Baudrillard J. Les stratégies fatales. Grasset, 2014, 288 p. [In Russ.: Baudrillard J. Fatalnye strategii. Moscow, RIPOL klassik Publ., 2017, 288 p.].
[16] Derrida J. L’écriture et la différence. Éditions du Seuil, Paris, 1967, 437 p. [In Russ.: Derrida J. Pismo i razlichie. Moscow, Akademicheskiy proekt Publ., 2000, 495 p.].
[17] Kuhn T.S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, 1962, 222 p. [In Russ.: Kuhn T.S. Struktura nauchnykh revolyutsiy. Moscow, AST Moskva Publ., 1974, 311 p.].
[18] Mulkay M.J. Science and the Sociology of Knowledge. HarperCollins Publishers Ltd, 1979, 144 p. [In Russ.: Mulkay M.J. Nauka i sotsiologiya znaniya. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1985, 273 p.].
[19] Hübner K. Kritik der wissenschaftlichen Vernunft. Verlag Karl Alber, 2002, 448 p. [In Russ.: Hübner K. Kritika nauchnogo razuma. Moscow, IFRAN Publ., 1994, 326 p.].
[20] Lebedev S.A., Koskov S.N. Novoe v psihologo-pedagogicheskikh issledovaniyah — Innovation in Psychological and Pedagogical Research, 2014, no. 1, pp. 7–13.