|

Evidence features in mathematics and law

Authors: Gubanov N.N., Cheremnykh L.G., Gubanov N.I. Published: 27.03.2017
Published in issue: #5(55)/2017  
DOI: 10.18698/2306-8477-2017-5-432  
Category: The Humanities in Technical University | Chapter: Philosophy Science  
Keywords: rational culture, evidence, science, mathematics, law

The paper outlines the main features and aspects of evidence interaction in mathematics and law. Mathematical evidence reliability is that a scientist conducting their research observes the consistency and coherence of all links in the chain of evidence. There is no definitive confirmation, either empirical or theoretical, of the truth of theories. Regress into infinity in justifying the thesis reliability is interrupted due to the cognitive will. The evidentiary process success does not exclusively depend on the extent of rationale but also on the ability to attract both logical arguments and arguments with socio-cultural nature. The evidentiary process includes logical, ideological, pragmatic, and ethical aspects both in mathematics and law practice.


References
[1] Ivlev Yu.V. Filosofiya i obshchestvo - Philosophy and Society, 2015, no. 3-4 (77), pp. 144-154.
[2] Biryukov B.V. Zhar kholodnykh chisel i pafos besstrastnoy logiki. Formalizatsiya myshleniya ot antichnykh vremen do epokhi kibernetiki [Cold numbers heat and impassive logic enthusiasm. The formalization of thought from the ancient times to the era of cybernetics]. Moscow, Znaniye Publ., 1977, 191 p.
[3] Gubanov N.I. Filosofskie nauki - Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences, 1986, no. 2, pp. 87-96.
[4] Lektorskiy V.A. Sub’ekt, ob’ekt, poznanie [Subject, object, cognition]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1980, 359 p.
[5] Gubanov N.I., Gubanov N.N. Mentalnoe i fizicheskoe prostranstvo [Mental and physical space]. Moscow, Etnosotsium Publ., 2016, 144 p.
[6] Vergiles N.Yu. Voprosy filosofii - Russian Studies in Philosophy, 1967, no. 4, pp. 63-72.
[7] Spasovich V.D. O teorii sudebno-ugolovnykh dokazatelstv: v svyazi s sudoustroystvom i sudoproizvodstvom. [On the theory of forensic criminal evidence: in connection with the judicial system and legal proceedings]. Moscow, LeksEst Publ., 2001, 112 p.
[8] Kazaryan V.P. Matematika i kultura [Mathematics and Culture]. Moscow, Scientific World, 2004, 240 p.
[9] Kleyn F. Voprosy ehlementarnoy i vysshey matematiki: lektcii, chitannye v Gettingenskom universitete. Ch. 1. Arifmetika, algebra i analiz [Problems of elementary and higher mathematics lectures, read at the University of Gottingen. Part 1. Arithmetic, Algebra and analysis]. Odessa, Mathesis Publ., 1912, 486 p.
[10] Laplas P. Opyt filosofii teorii veroyatnostey [Experience in philosophy of probability theory]. Moscow, Librokom Publ., 2011, 208 p.
[11] Tikhonov V.I. Statisticheskaya radiotekhnika [Statistical radios]. Moscow, Radio and Svyaz Publ., 1982, 624 p.
[12] Ovsyannikov I.V. Problemy logiki dokazyvaniya (ot veroyatnosti k dostovernosti v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve) [Evidence logic problems (probability of credibility in criminal proceedings)]. Saratov, Saratov Institute of the Russian Interior Ministry Publ., 2000, 131 p.
[13] Gubanov N.I., Gubanov N.N. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Filosofiya - Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: Philosophy, 2016, no. 2, pp. 21-32.
[14] Gubanov N.N., Gubanov N.I. Gumanitarnyj vestnik - Humanities Bulletin, 2016, no. 2 (40). DOI: 10.18698/2306-8477-2016-2-344
[15] Perminov V.Ya. Razvitie predstavleniy o nadezhnosti matematicheskogo dokazatelstva [Development of representations of mathematical proof reliability]. Moscow, Editorial URSS Publ., 2004, 240 p.
[16] Cheremnykh L.G. Filosofiya i obshchestvo - Philosophy and Society, 2009, no. 2 (54), pp.135-141.
[17] Gubanov N.N., Gubanov N.I. Gumanitarnyj vestnik - Humanities Bulletin, 2016, no. 4 (42). DOI: 10.18698/2306-8477-2016-4-353