|

Representology and its epistemological status

Authors: Inozemtsev V.A. Published: 13.01.2017
Published in issue: #2(52)/2017  
DOI: 10.18698/2306-8477-2017-2-418  
Category: The Humanities in Technical University | Chapter: Philosophy Science  
Keywords: representology, problem of knowledge representation, problem of knowledge computer representation, discursive and engineering approach to knowledge, cognitive sciences, computer sciences, artificial intelligence (AI), artificial intelligence epistemological content, epistemology of AI, computer epistemology

The article considers representology as a conceptual formalization of the problem of knowledge representation in modern science. The subject, main sections and problems of the concepts of philosophical, cognitive and computer representology proposed by the author are defined, as well as the concepts of AI epistemology and computer epistemology.


References
[1] Baksanskiy O.E., Kucher E.N. Kognitivnye nauki. Ot poznaniya k deystviyu [Cognitive sciences. From knowledge to action]. Moscow, Editorial-URSS Publ., 2005, 182 p.
[2] Inozemtsev V.A. Reprezentatsiya znaniya v sovremennoy nauke: filosofsko-metodologicheskiy analiz [Representation of knowledge in modern science: Philosophical and methodological analysis]. Moscow, MGTU "MAMI" Publ., 2009, 234 p.
[3] Inozemtsev V.A. Logiko-epistemologicheskoe issledovanie iskusstvennogo intellekta: fenomen komputernoy reprezentatsii znaniya [Logical and epistemological study of artificial intelligence: The phenomenon of the computer representation of knowledge]. Moscow, ITO SEMRIK Publ., 2014, 160 p.
[4] Inozemtsev V.A. Epistemologicheskoe soderzhanie iskusstvennogo intellekta [Epistemological content of artificial intelligence]. Moscow, ITO SEMRIK Publ., 2015, 157 p.
[5] Inozemtsev V.A. Izvestiya MGTU "MAMI" - Scientific journal "Izvestiya MGTU "MAMI", 2014, vol. 5, no. 1 (19), pp. 121-126.
[6] Filosofiya iskusstvennogo intellekta [Philosophy of artificial intelligence]. Materialy Vserossiyskoy mezhdistsiplinarnoy konferentsii [Proceedings of the interdisciplinary conference]. Moscow, IF RAN Publ., 2005, 399 p.
[7] Belyanin V.G. Vvedenie vpsiholingvistiku [Introduction to psycholinguistics]. Moscow, MGLU Publ., 1999, 126 p.
[8] Neisser, U. Cognitive psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall Publ., 1967 [In Russ.: Naysser U. Kognitivnaya psikhologiya. Moscow, Trivola Publ., 2000, 467 p.].
[9] Solso, R. L. Cognitive psychology . Boston, MA, Allyn & Bacon Publ., 1991 [In Russ.: Solso R. Kognitivnaya psihologiya. Moscow, Trivola Publ., 1996, 598 p.].
[10] Boden M. Artificial intelligence in psychology. Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press Publ., 1988, 188 p.
[11] Minskiy M. Freymy dlya predstavleniya znaniy [Frames for knowledge representation]. Moscow, Mir Publ., 1979, 151 p.
[12] Pospelov D.A. Logiko-lingvisticheskie modeli v upravlenii [Logico-linguistic models in management]. Moscow, Energoatomizdat Publ., 1981, 231p.
[13] Pylyshyn Z. Computation and cognition. Forward a foundation for cognitive science. Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press Publ., 1985, 292 p.
[14] Logicheskiy podkhod k iskusstvennomu intellektu [The logical approach to artificial intelligence]. Moscow, Mir Publ., 1990, 428 p.
[15] Ueno H., Isudzuka M., eds. Predstavlenie i ispolzovanie znaniy [Representation and use of knowledge]. Moscow, Mir Publ., 1989, 220 p.
[16] Orlowska E., Pawlak Zd. Logical foundations of knowledge representation. Warsaw, IPI Publ., 1984, 106 p.
[17] Winograd T. Frame representation and declarative-procedural controversy. Representation and understanding. New York, Academic Press Publ., 1975, pp. 185-210.
[18] Winograd T., Florens W. Understanding computers and cognition. New York, Academic Press Publ., 1987, 209 p.
[19] Arbib M.A. The metaphorical brain. New York, Wiley Publ., 1972. [In Russ.: Arbib M. Metaforicheskiy mozg. Moscow, Editorial-URSS Publ., 2004, 295 s.].
[20] Lektorskiy V.A. Epistemologiya klassicheskaya i neklassicheskaya [Classical and nonclassical epistemology]. Moscow, Editorial-URSS Publ., 2001, 255 p.